SCOTUS rules government can’t take more than what’s owed from property owners. Learn what states need to do to reform their unconstitutional laws.

Confusing Procedures Can Result in Shadow Equity Theft

Some states ostensibly allow property owners to claim their surplus equity, but the claims process these states set up is so complicated and difficult as to effectively continue the practice of home equity theft. As we show below using data from Michigan, such confusing procedures result in most property owners not claiming their equity at all, leaving money on the table for lienholders or the government to take. The outcome is the same as home equity theft, but it is hidden in the shadows of the claims process.

Shadow equity theft happens because property owners bear the burden of asking the government for their constitutionally mandated compensation, and they must ask for it before their property is sold, requiring them to claim the surplus equity before it even exists. Failure to navigate this backward process results in accidental waiver of the constitutional right to just compensation.

Below is information on the states that have a process that can result in shadow equity theft. For Michigan, we also provide data on claim rates by property owners.

Instead of trading one unconstitutional system for another that does little to protect property owners, these states should amend their laws to provide a constitutional process for returning sales proceeds for equity to property owners. States such as Nebraska and Massachusetts should serve as models for reforms in the states listed below.